Crossword
Sift Partners Network:Varo CMSScrape UpEscalopter

Porn Bumper

Retroactive Comment Editing
posted by lucky760 3 months ago • 492 views
We've changed comments to make it so you can only make modifications in the first hour 24 hours after submission. It's a small change but a necessary one (anyone remember SnakePlissken?), so if you go looking for the edit link and it's not there, you know why.





bookmarks (0)
Comments subscribe to this feed
Good change, well done. You suck, I hate you all!


written by gwiz665  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Boo.


written by MarineGunrock  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 4 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Think about it as having 20/20 foresight and that should turn your frown upside-down. (Better to protect comments than to wait for someone to go nuts and permanently erase Sift content.)


written by lucky760  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
dact and redact sat on a wall.


written by my15minutes  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 4 ▼ | flag spam (0)
i want more history on this snakeplissken ordeal. I've heard the reference multiple times...can somebody update little ol' me?


written by rottenseed  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 3 ▼ | flag spam (0)
^Snakeplissken cannot be explained, only lived. Peace be upon him.

When we are worthy, he will return.


written by dag  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 6 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Only the original cabal know of Snakeplissken's ascent.

I don't know how I feel about this.


written by Farhad2000  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 3 ▼ | flag spam (0)
I can't see the point of this...So no more [edits] or [updates] because some guy named after a Kurt Russell character did something wrong? Boo, I say.


written by rasch187  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 5 ▼ | flag spam (0)
I can't say I feel strongly either way, but on balance, I think it's probably a bad idea. Many comments are edited due to new information, correcting erroneous information, or redacting personal information, among other things. I get what you're saying about foresight, but I think holding users to a binding policy like that may cause more problems than it will solve. Which begs the question - has there been a rash of edited comments recently that has caused problems? Why do this now?

Also, this may be very confusing for new users down the road, who don't see this post, and naturally assume that the 'edit' functionality is not time restricted.


written by jonny  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 5 ▼ | flag spam (0)
I hate to invoke the "most sites" defense (if mosts sites jumped off a cliff ...) but most sites don't allow for eternal retroactive comment editing - and there are valid reasons for this.

For one, it can mess up the flow of a thread that others have responded to down-stream and sew confusion all around.

Is it unreasonable to require, that we as members, commit to our verbage at some point?


written by dag  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 3 ▼ | flag spam (0)
I say allow edits after the first hour, but content can only be striken through, not erased. Of course, new content can be added. I'm not sure how this would be implemented.


written by nibiyabi  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
This is a good change. You need to maintain the integrity and logical flow of the comments as Dag has mentioned.


written by Deano  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
I wonder how it would effect users like Pinky who share personal information one night and then realize that they shared too much the next day?


written by Farhad2000  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 13 ▼ | flag spam (0)
I remember dealing with snake plissken several times in one of our many sift arguments but i dont know what ordeal they are refering too.


written by K0MMIE  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Every one should go on Comment Strike!

Why? I dont know...


written by NordlichReiter  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Would allowing 24 hours be too long? I like to sober up and then correnct my splelling.


written by schmawy  | 3 months ago | CH
★▲ 15 ▼ | flag spam (0)
>> ^Farhad2000:
I wonder how it would effect users like Pinky who share personal information one night and then realize that they shared too much the next day?


In such extreme circumstances, one could just ask an admin to modify their comment for them.




written by lucky760  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Sifters, who post under the influence, will have to be more careful.


written by dotdude  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Fear being the mind-killer, memories of plissken, memories of a once-mediocre set of parameters, ending with pathetic crescendo, of we have to rob, steal, beg, or fuck art in it's ass, to assure that we keep the Jew's gold......

Fucking Jews, fucking Nazis.....Now that'd make a great snuff film......

Pathetic
Weak
Twisted
and Fucked.......


written by choggie  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
I feel schmawy has a good point here. Why set the limit at 1 hour, instead of 12 or 24 hours?

*sticky this. I want to hear what people think of this.


written by rasch187  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Stickying this post at the top of Sift Talk - sticky requested by rasch187.


written by siftbot  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
I regret this, then edited it within 24 hours, but after this I couldn't edit it when I regret that too.

Crap.

Let it live forever on the intarnets and provoke more undue negative emotions.

Edit: You should have seen what I had written before I edited this comment.


written by Abducted  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
>> ^dotdude:
Sifters, who post under the influence, will have to be more careful.


man, I'm always under the influence
but, srsly, the snake plissken story must be told now that you gave us a taste of it - come on, oldtimers, we want a story!!


written by kulpims  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Okay- The community has spoken. We told SiftBot what you guys said. He grumbled a little and told me to leave him alone, but I think we can convince him to allow comment editing for 24 hours after submission.

*set24hourcommentedit


written by lucky760  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 8 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Setting comment edit time to 24 hours - set24hourcommentedit requested by lucky760 after insistence by my meat farm.


written by siftbot  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 13 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Will sifty be set up to redact harsh words in case I drunk-comment and wake up 24 hours later in a regretful stupor?


written by blahpook  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Huzzah! Drinks, for allll my frieeeeeeends!


written by schmawy  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 5 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Oh and *quality management as always.


written by schmawy  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Awarding lucky760 with one star point for this contribution to Sift Talk - declared quality by schmawy.


written by siftbot  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
I still don't like it.


written by MarineGunrock  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)
^grumpy smurf


written by dag  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 4 ▼ | flag spam (0)
>> ^siftbot:
Setting comment edit time to 24 hours - set24hourcommentedit requested by lucky760 after insistence by my meat farm.

your mother was a potato peeler...




written by rottenseed  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 4 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Maybe y'all could add a feature like Google did where you have to answer a few math questions to prove you're sober before you can send an email. It's call "Mail Goggles."


written by T-man  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
*unsticky


written by dag  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Unstickying this post from the top of Sift Talk - unsticky requested by dag.


written by siftbot  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
*sticky
fuck that shit


written by choggie  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Stickying this post at the top of Sift Talk - sticky requested by choggie.


written by siftbot  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
S'goddamn lame, excuse, for a major fuck-up......


written by choggie  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Hey Choggie- if you have something constructive to add (and a reason for restickying this) please feel free speak up.


written by dag  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Speaking-
This is not how it has always been-0why lose a feature that affords access to the contributor-not so much the editing feature-the goddamn history of our entire trek!!

I smell a whole lotta shit here, and its not mine.....


written by choggie  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
unless, I could be a dumbass......how doooo we check everything we've ever said....Go find sifts???


written by choggie  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Oh wait....you're not talking to me dag, you are talking at me.....don't play that shit-


written by choggie  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
doubleplus*unsticky


written by choggie  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Unstickying this post from the top of Sift Talk - unsticky requested by choggie.


written by siftbot  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
dinna think you had anything to say but what you did dag, and you screamed it loud and fucking clear......
*sticky little flypaper, wonder what it tastes like-mmmmmmmm....cold.
Poison......
Trying to escape, can't move.....fuck!

This Stable sucks, pasture looks green, perhaps a walk...


written by choggie  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Stickying this post at the top of Sift Talk - sticky requested by choggie.


written by siftbot  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Choggie - I would call this "attention seeking behaviour" - while it may be fun to watch from the sidelines this kind of stuff hurts the sift. Please chill out or sleep it off - whichever remedy applies best. Thanks


written by dag  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ -1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
*unsticky


written by K0MMIE  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Invocations (unsticky) cannot be called by K0MMIE because K0MMIE is not privileged - sorry.


written by siftbot  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
I like it. 24 hours is plenty of time to sober up and fix grievous errors, after that people just have to stand by what they write.


written by gwiz665  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ -1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Weaaaaaaaak. Gaaaaaaaaaay. Laaaaaaaaame. Next thing you know we'll awesome Mods with names like DragonQuestSlayer1 that remove anything they don't like. Hello Gamespot.


written by CaptainPlanet420  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ -3 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Well, I wanted to edit my last post, but I dunno if I caught it soon enough. Guess just make more comments is the answer. CHOGGIE FTW, posers lay down!


written by CaptainPlanet420  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ -2 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Oh.....sober.....Well, easy to write off truth by pulljng the alcohol card-Simply.....a lack of comprehension admission would suffice....Sober is my middle fucking name.....


written by choggie  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
*sticky


written by choggie  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Stickying this post at the top of Sift Talk - sticky requested by choggie.


written by siftbot  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Honored to be reckoned as such, never knew the man-Left periods, innit???
Who IS/WAS this man snakeplissken????....Tell us more, please-Seems someone has an opinion based in hard fact......

SG knows, axe her.......


written by choggie  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
*unsticky


written by rasch187  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Unstickying this post from the top of Sift Talk - unsticky requested by rasch187.


written by siftbot  | 3 months ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
this is what happens when a site gets too popular. creators abandon their most loyal early adopters because of a stupid disagreement. it's not like losing a few members will hurt your ad revenue bottom line. follow in digg's footsteps; that's what you've been trying to do since the beginning. and doing a fine job of it.

it's draconian to take away our ability to change or alter our own comments. and as far as the "breaking the comment flow" goes, people should be quoting the person they're speaking to when they respond in the first place. then it won't matter if a previous comment is taken away. reddit does it with the ">" symbol. pretty simple really.

oh well, time to move on for me anyway. i'll probably be banned for voicing my opinion too.


written by joemawlma  | 1 month ago | CH
▲ -1 ▼ | flag spam (0)
You don't like it, gtfo.

Why do you want the ability? For the principle of the thing? To be able to duck and cover, and erase all your steps here? Then DON'T POST.

Quotes can be changed anyway, look:

>> ^joemawlma:
Waah waah waaah, freedom of speech, waah waah waah, draconian, waaaah

It's not like we don't have any say in the matter, we did get it changed to 24hours before lockdown.


written by gwiz665  | 1 month ago | CH
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment
log in or register to submit new comment