comment listing type:
Top New Jazz Videos by Vote
Subscribe
Top 15 Sifters of All Time
Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week
VideoSift Links
comment listing type: Top New Jazz Videos by Vote Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week VideoSift Links |


Zombie Snake Head - it is still alive!
Persephone asks: Why is there a cow mooing at the end?
Because their voiceboxes are incapable of screaming in horror like humans? X D
Palin Explains Why Raped Women Should Be Forced ToBear child
Would you use Sarah Palin as a role model for aspiring young women who want to get in to politics? "Look girls, one day you can be as incoherent and unprepared as Ms. Palin..." I think not. She is, daily, setting back real women in politics because she just reinforces the "old boys" opinion that women are unsuited for such careers.
That is not to say she is completely incapable as a politician, merely that she is so far out of her depth that she looks incapable. I oppose her moral stances and think that governments should lean towards less meddling in the affairs of citizens (ie. reducing this mania for victimless crimes), but that is another issue.
Point 2: Abortion. Oooh, very scary topic. Splitting hairs over sentience or when life actually stops being an abstract concept and actually gets a ticket to this great ride we call human existence is pointless because there is no clear determinate that everyone will agree on.
My personal take? Leave the choice to the mother and let her take responsibility for her actions and the life of her child. In the long run, the government and the pro-lifers do not have to spend the rest of their life raising said child or taking responsibility for it. They make a nice clean moral judgement and wash their hands of the rest.
I do not agree with killing unborn babies but faced with the choice of forcing a woman to live with a child produced by rape when she really doesn't want to, there is no question in my mind that her priorities and preferences must take precedence over my own. Following on, if a young women get's pregnant (through lack of contraception, failure of contraception, stupidity etc), do I or anyone else have the right to dictate that the rest of her life must follow a certain path because of an error in judgement?
To mitigate this, set an arbitrary period on legal abortion at which point it is reasonable to expect a person to have made a informed decision on whether they want to terminate the child. Add a self-defense clause re: imminent danger of death to the mother and you're done.
ps. Some people might think ^ is a bit flippant. It's not, but the complexity of the issue and the emotion charged nature of it means that there will never be a true meeting of the minds. As such, the only recourse a government should take is an arbitrary decision that acknowledges that pro-lifers get the easiest time in this whole debate, but demand the most.
That is, they get to dictate terms of how another persons life plays out, but take no responsibility for that result. No care taken, no responsibility taken.
In some cases, they take that self righteousness a step or 2 further...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion-related_violence
Roman siege engine recreated -- shoots stone balls 125 yards
X D
Christianity In A Nutshell
Incapable, as in unwilling, resistant, hesitant, stubborn, close minded, etc. I didn't call them stupid because stupidity encompasses their whole life, and I know enough successful and intelligent people that go all crazy when it comes to religious dogma. Yeah he's a CPA but he thinks Adam and Eve rode dinosaurs, and that praying can actually cure cancer. So yeah, INCAPABLE was the right word.
Didn't say it wasn't. I just don't think you come off any less insulting using it instead of stupid... =)
As for being intolerant or Religious people, I'm more than happy to say live and let live, but too many of them refuse to live by the same creed. I don't mind the believers that go to church and live by the bible and keep there beliefs to themselves, the ones I don't like are the one that think their beliefs give then the right to demand that society pander to their particular brand of BULLSHIT.
I didn't call you intolerant. I said the problem is intolerance. I was specifically referring to the sift clip.
I firmly believe that the majority of societies ills are caused by religion,
I think you'll find greed is actually top of that list. Seriously, where does religion work in to a car jacking?
religion has been the root cause of most of the wars this world has seen
Incorrect, the vast bulk of wars were motivated by land grabs (including wars of independence). The most notable religious wars were of course the Crusades.
not to mention all the terrorism that has religion as it's origin.
So let me get this right. Relgion is responsible for all the terrorism based on religion..? Well, you got me there.
And until such time as the people of this world evolve to the point where religion is no longer an influence, we'll continue to have all the same problems.
It'll never happen. Humans need belief, even if it's in themselves. It is a core part of the human condition, we search for greater meaning and even when we eschew higher powers, we seek that meaning in other ways.
Religion will never go away. Scientology proves that. Make up a wacky story, charge admission price and people flock to it, even though the casual observer should be able to figure out it's a huge money scam...
However, that is kinda irrelevant. Removing religion will not cure humanity of it's traits.
PS I used to be agnostic, then I turned 8.
Was that about the same time you turned in to a condescending asshole? *rolls eyes*
$700 Billion Bailout: "We should not be rushed into this!"
As a Libertarian/Republican I'm horrified by the government ponying up a trillion bucks to rescue a financial system that basically screwed itself over. This isn't the work of a conservative government - this is a massive slide into Socialism.
How is robbing the taxpayers of billions of dollars to ensure companies that are failing due to bad business decisions "socialist"..?
Socialism is supposed to shift power from capitalists back in to the hands of the people (eg. Labor unions are a socialist organisation, the willingly strike and endanger their own jobs for the greater good of the whole).
What you have here, Mr. Rebulican/Libertarian, is a government taking money from the people (you know, those things that socialists are fond of) and handing it to the capitalists with no strings attached. Even worse is the supposition that these monies will be used to pay out execs.
That, my friend, is criminal...
Last but not least, the whole stupid bloody market is prompted up on the very thin premise that one of your countries biggest creditors (you know, China... That big communist place, ooh, very scary...) won't just decide to dump your currency at which point the exact sum of the rescue package really becomes immaterial. Doesn't matter if you divide a dollar worth of zero by 700bn or 10 trillion, the answer is still "error".
Toobin: Can We Please Cut The Suspended Campaign Crap?
McCain's All In Bet on the Stupidity of the American People
Why oh why do Olbermann's guest-speakers always look like they are on drugs? Do they get handed a spliff before coming on the show to cope with the anxiety?
Eh, I'd bring my own... ; )
Christianity In A Nutshell
I won't go so far as to say too stupid to comprehend, rather incapable (perhaps too frightened) of understanding anything that might cast doubt on their faith, and usually responding with pure vitriol and hate.
Yeah, incapable is much better than stupid...
"You're not so much dumb as retarded"... Nah, you did a bang up job of not offending anyone... *rolls eyes*
The problem with Christianity, atheism, vegetarianism, pro-life, feminism etc etc etc (pretty much any divider that segregates people in to groups/factions) is not that people believe a certain thing, it is that they are intolerant of people having their own beliefs.
Don't impinge on other peoples rights and believe what you want. The world will be a much better place...
And for the record I'm agnostic.
How to create a $1,000,000,000,000 industry!
Too little capitalism, the government essentially controls everything and stifles investment/growth. There is little room for the entrepreneur in a solid socialist society.
Too little socialism and the corporations control the people. Then you see extreme prices on drugs (which could be subsidised for the greater good), high cost for medical care, companies that willfully break the law to improve their shareholders value because it is so competitive that one false move can see the whole house of cards collapse...
I think extremists to either view point will always be the ones that get it the most wrong. If you at least have 2 different viewpoints, hopefully there will be a middleground that satisfies most of the people most of the time.
Republican Doofus Gets Taken for a Ride
Y'know, it's clear this guy is an ignorant fool, but it's just sad that there are those who would seek to take pleasure in the misfortune of others. This man is a sad person. He's misguided and dangerously so, but that doesn't mean we should wish hell and damnation upon him. I've done stupid things in my life. I think we all have. Perhaps this guy's stupid thing was caught on tape. (Though it really seems like he's just doing this tongue-in-cheek to egg on the interviewer, but that's beside the point.)
No matter what this person has done, he does not deserve to get abused by having $150,000 taken from him. Yes, his ideas deserve to get ridiculed. Yes, he's being a total douchbag.
But yes, he's _human_. Just like you and I. He is ignorant, but trying to say he somehow deserves to be attacked because he has chosen to be stupid is very selfish and, as a whole, just as ignorant. We're in this problem, this fucking mess over in the middle east, because the Republicans appealed to our vindictive side to coerce us to let them start a war. The correct answer is always compassion. The correct answer is _never war_. That is precisely the opposite message being sent by The Young Turks in this clip.
It's sad to see this side stooping to the lows of the other... It will only be when we can all exist without this hate that we will finally know peace. Hopefully we'll find it before we destroy ourselves.
*ahem*
He is supporting a repeat of an action that saw 1,000,000 Iraqi's dead, is driving your country to the brink of bankruptcy (and shows no sign of slowing down) and, quite frankly, America today reminds me of Japanese or German imperialism during the Second World War.
He is advocating war against a country which has no possible way to strike at the US or it's allies in any meaningful capacity. It verges on the criminal and he should be thankful all she did was rob him.
As for QM, lol, you need to get better at trolling cos you really suck at it... =)
Sarah Palin is a Religious Nutcase
"Religious nutcase" here defined as anyone who isn't a "secular humanist".
I'd rather have an atheist president than a Muslim cough one.
When a Muslim candidate shows up, I guess you can start rapidly frothing at the mouth with the rest of the right wingers.
Ironically, you do them the justice of capitalising "Muslim", showing it a degree of respect even as you denigrate it... X D
Maher, Garofalo, & Rushdie destroy Fund's defense of Palin
Wave something so confusing in front of the voters ("She has no fucking grip on policy?!?!??") that they actually quit trying to make sense of it and just go for the shiny one.
With Lehman's going under and the financial crisis apparently deepening under the Bush administration, I shudder to think what those retards will do for 4 more years.
I think I should create a bloody signature consisting of:
G'luck America...
I seem to be using it a lot lately.
Obama Blasts McCain on "Lipstick-gate"
The non-muslim, non-marxist Obamessiah shows his contempt for the intelligence of the American people.
This newest applicant for White House affirmative action should be glad the drive-by media is focused on this fluff, and not the domestic terrorists and racist 'church' he's allied with.
Left wing dopes have been assaulting the character of their enemies since bolshevik days. They have to, since facts don't support their failed political theories.
You know that what you wrote is the single biggest indicator that he is right...
An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the man", "argument against the man") consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim. The process of proving or disproving the claim is thereby subverted, and the argumentum ad hominem works to change the subject.
It is most commonly used to refer specifically to the ad hominem as abusive, sexist, racist, or argumentum ad personam, which consists of criticizing or attacking the person who proposed the argument (personal attack) in an attempt to discredit the argument. It is also used when an opponent is unable to find fault with an argument, yet for various reasons, the opponent disagrees with it.
So continue spluttering away with your inconsequential rants, they just reinforce the fact that Obama's opponents categorically cannot debate him on the points so they have to spin bullshit to try and make him look bad.
The sad thing is enough morons might buy it to get McCain elected. G'luck America, you're going to need it.
U.S gov bails out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
http://www.earlham.edu/~jond/2003%20Stuff/Sugar_Rules.html
"The current program, put in place in 1981"
Subsidies etc = a form of socialism, lending a helping hand to those in need. The guy in the video justifies the bail out of FM/FM by pointing out the horrible ramifications, both domestically and abroad... So, your taxpaying dollars are being spent to help not only fellow citizens but foreigners.. X )
The irony is just delightful. More seriously, your level of self delusion and denial is scary at times...