comment listing type:
http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:vdjM4cPRf-LMCM:http://bp1.blogger.com/_IdL4ekvq_M0/Ry3oIsck5tI/AAAAAAAAAys/n4ptGN3bHNI/s320/sander_phar_africa~~~_101b.jpg
Top New Jazz Videos by Vote
Subscribe
Top 15 Sifters of All Time
Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week
VideoSift Links








Thanks to you, impeachment will be heard Friday
Farhad2000
the corporation - advertisements targeting children:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMDPql6rweo
Tom and Jerry - The Two Mouseketeers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjytLcdpZk0
In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:
Curious to hear why in your book Tom and Jerry is R. I can understand why Saving Private Ryan is PG-13 though...
In reply to this comment by rabidness:
Coming from a gamer :
I would rather see the kid playing counterstrike instead of team fortress 2.
I would rather see the kid playing a game with realistic violence with realistic consequences(screams, blood, death) than playing a cartoonish parody of violence which whitewashes nearly all consequences of the act.
I would rather see the kid watching Saving Private Ryan(rating PG-13 in my book) instead of Tom and Jerry(rating R in my book.)
I think most childhood violence happens due to the 'acceptable'(aka unreal) violence in our daily media consumption. It subconsciously debases all reality of the act. I ask you, are parents who slaughter an animal on the family farm worse human beings because the child now has an understanding of death? I hope you realize 'no.'
I know most parents want to hold onto their child's innocence as long as they can, but that's their style of parenting. It takes all kinds, right?